Testing the efficiency of the buck converter at different step down ratios. Muppet 2 project.

By Julian

Youtuber, shed dweller, solar charge controller aficionado

13 thoughts on “Buck converter efficiency testing”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Lukas Pfitscher says:

    My question is if i have a source 10v and i put two stepp down to 5v in series and on the other end again in parallel so i converting 5v to 5v on each steppdown so a have a eficiency of 100%??

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars GivenFirstName FamilyFirstName says:

    It is the opinion of some excellent viewers who feel that you have let us all down (a wee bit). Capacitors?

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars 2D Weather Sandbox (Niels Daemen) says:

    No output capacitor!?

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars ziplock9000 says:

    It would have been helpful at the start to mention something about the load. If one is needed, if the value is important etc

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars James Balagtas says:

    it does not increase the current, must be the inductor and freq used. The L used is commonly 150khz on most converters that increase the current when bucking

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Scott Murdoch says:

    Did you ever do the vid with the output cap? I can't see one.

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Raphael Hofmann says:

    Maybe a True RMS Multimeter could help out. Maybe someone could lend you two Gossen Metrahit Energy Multimeters?

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars riz94107 says:

    Did the capacitor video ever get posted? I just watched the buck converter series but don't see it… Maybe I'm just blind.

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Mortlet says:

    How did you decide on a "reasonable" switching frequency?
    Do you actually like that sound CRT TVs used to make, or is it rather meant as a joke to annoy someone else?

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Tony Eezi says:

    Could the bump (similar efficiency reading) in the output be because that is near the natural frequency of the circuit?

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Zegarac Robert says:

    You stepped power down with voltage, how bout you try to keep power level constant while stepping voltage down (one step at a time), changing two values at the same time does not paint the same picture…

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars RWBHere says:

    Can you please run the same tests at much lower switching frequency, such as 100 Hz? Semiconductor switching losses will be affecting measured efficiency. And what percentage of the losses are also the result of inductor core losses? Your meters will also be introducing measurement errors, because of the non-sinusoidal waveforms. Finally, can you check the currents by using the same meter on input, then output? That would eliminate the differences in readings between two meters, neither of whose errors are exactly linear wrt current levels. Thanks.

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Philip Ashmore says:

    As the voltage output goes down, the current wants to go up, so you should match the impedance to conserve the power input/output.
    Think of class D amplifiers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.